UhlLinuxServer N3 Risk Assessment
Tags: UhlLinuxServer Information_Governance_Category
1 Illicit Access to Server
1.1 Impact
- 1.1.1 Attacker could have access to data stored on the server
- 1,1.2 Attacker could corrupt data stored on the server
- 1.1.3 Attacker could change or corrupt the software running on the machine
1.2 Likelihood
- 1.2.1 The servers are available on the NHS N3 Network and so an attack is unlikely
1.3 Mitigation
- 1.3.1 Access via ssh is only allowed from within UHL
- 1.3.2 VMs are backed up daily to allow a restore if a corruption occurs
- 1.3.3 Software is available online or from source repositories (SVN or Git)
- 1.3.4 The firewall only allows access to specific IP addresses
1.4 Improvements
- 1.4.1 Access could be restricted to users with an SSH key. #756
- 1.4.2 Disaster Recovery Testing #360
2 Illicit Access to Data
2.1 Impact
- 2.1.1 Attacker could have access to data stored on the server
- 2.1.2 Attacker could corrupt data stored on the server
- 2.1.3 Attacker could use access to the database to access the machine
2.2 Likelihood
- 2.2.1 The servers are available on the NHS N3 and so an attack is unlikely
2.3 Mitigation
- 2.3.1 VMs are backed up daily to allow a restore if a corruption occurs
- 2.3.2 Databases are backed up daily with a history of 3 months to allow for recovery
- 2.3.3 Database server can only write data to the temp and database directories
- 2.3.4 The firewall only allows access to specific IP addresses
2.4 Improvements
- 2.4.1 Access could be restricted to users with an SSH key. #757
- 2.4.2 Disaster Recovery Testing #360
3 Illicit Use or Corruption of Data or Software by Employees
3.1 Impact
- 3.1.1 Data could be released to the public
- 3.1.2 Data could be lost or corrupted (see 7 below)
- 3.1.3 Software could lost or corrupted (see 8 below)
3.2 Likelihood
- 3.2.1 It is unlikely, but these things happen
3.3 Mitigation
- 3.3.1 Remove user accounts as soon as employees leave.
- 3.3.2 Backups of VMs are kept securely off site.
- 3.3.3 Software is kept in source repositories, which track changes and can be restored back to any point.
3.4 Improvements
4 Illicit Access to Software
4.1 Impact
- 4.1.1 Attacker could have access to data stored in the application
- 4.1.2 Attacker could corrupt data stored in the application
4.2 Likelihood
- 4.2.1 The servers are available on the NHS N3 and so an attack is unlikely
4.3 Mitigation
- 4.3.1 Enforce a strong password policy
- 4.3.2 Use LDAP authentication where possible
- 4.3.4 The firewall only allows access to specific IP addresses
4.4 Improvements
5 Communication Interception
5.1 Impact
- 5.1.1 Application data could become exposed
5.2 Likelihood
- 5.2.1 The servers are available on the NHS N3 Network and so an attack is unlikely
5.3 Mitigation
- 5.3.1 All communications use SSL
5.4 Improvements
6 Software Security Vulnerability
6.1 Impact
- 6.1.1 Software systems could become insecure
- 6.1.2 Data could be lost or corrupted (see 7 below)
- 6.1.3 Software could lost or corrupted (see 8 below)
- 6.1.4 Data could be exposed
6.2 Likelihood
- 6.2.1 Vulnerabilities in software are constantly coming to light, but sites are only visible within the UHL network.
6.3 Mitigation
- 6.3.1 Software is kept up to date
- 6.3.2 Applications are run as a restricted user account that does not have permission to make configuration changes
- 6.3.3 The firewall only allows access to specific IP addresses
6.4 Improvements
7 Data Loss or Corruption
7.1 Impact
- 7.1.1 Jeopardize feasibility of studies where data is lost
7.2 Likelihood
- 7.2.1 A major loss would require a catastrophic failure
- 7.2.2 A smaller loss or corruption of data is much more common
7.3 Mitigation
- 7.3.1 Data is backed up daily and kept for 3 months
- 7.3.2 The VMs are also backed up daily and stored securely off site
7.4 Improvements
8 Software Loss or Corruption
8.1 Impact
- 8.1.1 Interrupt progress of studies until systems can be restored
8.2 Likelihood
- 8.2.1 A major loss is unlikely, but minor problems can easily occur when software is being upgraded
8.3 Mitigation
- 8.3.1 VMs are backed up daily and stored securely off site
- 8.3.2 Software is stored in source code repositories that are backed up and any version can be retrieved
- 8.3.3 Processes to install software are documented within TRAC and automation is employed to simplify the process
8.4 Improvements
- 8.4.1 Move automation should be introduced
Last modified
8 years ago
Last modified on 08/26/16 14:27:58
Note:
See TracWiki
for help on using the wiki.