Changes between Version 23 and Version 24 of OnyxExportOntology

Timestamp:

01/31/11 10:33:28 (13 years ago)

Author:

jeff.lusted

Comment:

--

OnyxExportOntology

@@ -386 +386 @@
 }}}
 Most categories are much more complicated than the above, particularly in a questionnaire stage, where they spawn a lower variable (like tobacco_any.N in the !RiskFactorQuestionnaire where the N is described within the previous tobacco_any variable as a Category). But the above choices (ELECTRONIC and MANUAL) are a bit like stand alone enumerations. At present for categories this simple, the choices are being overlooked and are not collected, which represents a loss of information.[[BR]]
-I suggest we collect this type of information by creating a lower level construct. I'm not sure what to call it, but I'm not concerned about the name provided its not misleading. What about <enum>? We can always change our minds later.
+I suggest we collect this type of information by creating a lower level construct. I'm not sure what to call it, but I'm not concerned about the name provided it's not misleading. What about <enum>? We can always change our minds later.
 
 ==== Weakness Two ====
@@ -404 +404 @@
   </variable>
 }}}
-Note that this is basically a statement. There is a similar construct within the !VerbalConsentQuestionnaire. They do not seem to require an answer, at least as far as I can see. I suggest we simply drop these. But it raises a good protocol: we need an exception report to highlight unusual cases when producing the intermediate ontologies.
+Note that this is basically a statement. There is a similar construct within the !VerbalConsentQuestionnaire. They do not seem to require an answer, at least as far as I can see. I suggest we simply drop these. But it raises a good requirement: we need an exception report to highlight unusual cases when producing the intermediate ontologies.
+
+==== Major Omission ====
+At present some questions within the intermediate ontology are omitting useful information. Have a look at this from the !RiskFactorQuestionnaire:
+{{{
+  <variable name="family_table" valueType="boolean" entityType="Participant">
+    <attributes>
+      <attribute name="stage" valueType="text">RiskFactorQuestionnaire</attribute>
+      <attribute name="questionnaire" valueType="text">RiskFactorQuestionnaire</attribute>
+      <attribute name="section" valueType="text">FAMILY_HISTORY</attribute>
+      <attribute name="page" valueType="text">12</attribute>
+      <attribute name="questionName" valueType="text">family_table</attribute>
+      <attribute name="parentQuestion" valueType="boolean">true</attribute>
+      <attribute name="label" valueType="text" locale="en">Number of Family members.</attribute>
+      <attribute name="instructions" valueType="text" locale="en">Include all biological relatives: children, brothers and sisters, both living and deceased. If you have more than nine brothers/sisters/children, select &apos;9&apos;.</attribute>
+      <attribute name="required" valueType="text">true</attribute>
+    </attributes>
+  </variable>
+}}}
+There are a couple of things to note about this:
+   1. questionName: family_table
+   1. parentQuestion: true
+   1. label: Number of Family members